nanog mailing list archives
Re: Collocation Access
From: John Curran <jcurran () mail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:14:34 -0500
At 3:03 PM -0500 12/28/06, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
... FE goes to colo (where he has been removed from the access list). Shows ID to guards, who knew him well, and is let in, list or no list. ... The FE got the money he wanted. The client got their router back. I am not sure if the guards were reprimanded or not.
Client informs colo provider that they were negligent by allowing the theft, and deducts the replacement cost from next invoice? /John
Current thread:
- Re: Collocation Access, (continued)
- Re: Collocation Access Leo Vegoda (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access chuck goolsbee (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Daniel Golding (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Sean Donelan (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Brandon Galbraith (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Provo (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Aaron Glenn (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Gaurab Raj Upadhaya (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Marshall Eubanks (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access John Curran (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Dec 28)
- Re: Collocation Access Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Jim Popovitch (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Adrian Chadd (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access Jim Popovitch (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access John Curran (Dec 28)
- RE: Collocation Access Randy Epstein (Dec 27)
- Re: Collocation Access chuck goolsbee (Dec 27)