nanog mailing list archives
Re: data center space
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:39:52 -0400
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:43:47 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?
If I was a Manhattan based company, and an event took out everything within 65 miles of there, whether my backups are OK is suddenly going to be the *least* of my concerns. (Hint - what percent of your employees commute *less* than 65 miles to work, and what disaster-recovery plans do you have for *them*?)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Google AdSense Crash, (continued)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Henry Linneweh (Apr 24)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Joel Jaeggli (Apr 24)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Peter Dambier (Apr 24)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Rodney Joffe (Apr 23)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 22)
- Re: Google AdSense Crash Martin Hannigan (Apr 22)
- Re: data center space Michael . Dillon (Apr 24)
- RE: data center space Lincoln Dale (Apr 24)
- Re: data center space Jim Popovitch (Apr 24)
- RE: data center space Lincoln Dale (Apr 24)
- Re: data center space Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 24)
- Re: data center space Michael . Dillon (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Josh Cheney (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Michael . Dillon (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Edward B. DREGER (Apr 25)
- RE: data center space Edward B. DREGER (Apr 25)
- Re: data center space Jeff Hayward (Apr 25)