nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism
From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels () cistron nl>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:58:22 +0000 (UTC)
In article <cistron.Pine.GSO.4.61.0604111656450.15259 () pants snark net>, Matt Ghali <matt () snark net> wrote:
.or do you think that TCP/IP connection should be held open until the message can be scanned for spam and viruses just so we can give a 550 MESSAGE REJECTED error instead of silently dropping it?absolutely. is that actually a problem, today, in 2006?
RCPT TO: <user1@domain> RCPT TO: <user2@domain> DATA . .. after content scanning, user1 wants the mail, user2 doesn't. Now what ? Mike.
Current thread:
- Re: well-known NTP?, (continued)
- Re: well-known NTP? Edward B. DREGER (Apr 11)
- Re: well-known NTP? (Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 12)
- Re: well-known NTP? (Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism) Peter Dambier (Apr 12)
- Re: well-known NTP? (Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism) Peter Dambier (Apr 12)
- Re: well-known NTP? (Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism) Peter Dambier (Apr 12)
- Re: well-known NTP? (Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism) Tony Finch (Apr 12)
- Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism Martin Hannigan (Apr 11)
- Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism Edward B. DREGER (Apr 11)
- Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism Joe Maimon (Apr 12)
- Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism Matt Ghali (Apr 13)
- Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism Peter Corlett (Apr 13)
- Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism Chris Kuethe (Apr 13)