nanog mailing list archives
Re: Net Neutrality
From: Christian Kuhtz <christian () kuhtz com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:45:16 -0400
On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On the other hand, if somebody's $DAYJOB has decided to offer selective performance degradation as a business model, we'll be happy to discuss itthen....
Vladis, Vladis, you really think it hasn't been? ;-)Just because all the legal issues haven't been sorted out, doesn't mean that it isn't a) the declared goal or b) the technology is not ready and developed. Oh you have little faith in, for example, RBOCs and their burning desire to evolve out of the plumbing business. ;-)
Current thread:
- Net Neutrality David Diaz (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Christian Kuhtz (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Eric Pancer (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Christian Kuhtz (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Eric Pancer (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Matt Ghali (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Christian Kuhtz (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Christian Kuhtz (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality David Diaz (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Albert Meyer (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Bill Woodcock (Apr 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Net Neutrality Fergie (Apr 06)
- Re: Net Neutrality Scott Weeks (Apr 06)