nanog mailing list archives
Re: Katrina Network Damage Report
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:09:36 +0530
On 12/09/05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet () consulintel es> wrote:
It seems to me that you're assuming that your access network will be multi-gigabit in order to support millions of hosts trying to scan each of your subnets simultaneously in order to finish in time before celebrating a couple of centuries before now ?
It will probably be multi terabit by the time you get enough hosts to fill a /48 But this is all a gedankenexperiment right now .. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: routing around the Katrina Network Damage Report, (continued)
- Re: routing around the Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Joel Jaeggli (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Dave Stewart (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 11)
- Re: Katrina Network Damage Report Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 11)