nanog mailing list archives
Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:30:46 -0400
Owen DeLong wrote:
A customer with a prefix assigned from this chunk has to connect with an ISP who has * a Very Large Multihoming (to handle scaling concerns) router somewhere in its network that peers to other ISP Very Large Multihoming routers. ISP operating a VLMrouter to offer multihoming service to their customers would originate the entire multihoming space prefix to their customers AND to all their peers. These would have ALL the prefixes from the Multihoming Space.So... Let me get this straight. You think that significantly changing the economic model of every ISP on the planet (or at least every large ISP on the planet) is easier than changing the code in every core router? ROTFLMAO Owen
ISPs who wish to connect customers who have allocations from the multihoming space must
a) announce the whole space aggregated b) peer with other providers who host other customersISPs who dont wish to connect these customers should feel free not to, and that will have no bearing on the rest of those who do.
If you are referring to the affect that this will attract "unwanted" traffic, that would be considered a COB.
In essence, the previous discussion about LNP suggested that telco's must do the same thing, attract unwanted traffic, traffic they must switch right back out of their network.
Current thread:
- design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Maimon (Oct 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Maimon (Oct 20)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Owen DeLong (Oct 20)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Maimon (Oct 20)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Michael . Dillon (Oct 21)
- Message not available
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Joe Maimon (Oct 21)
- RE: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Neil J. McRae (Oct 21)
- RE: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Randy Bush (Oct 21)
- RE: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Neil J. McRae (Oct 21)
- RE: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Matt Ghali (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Tony Li (Oct 21)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Randy Bush (Oct 23)
- What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)
- Re: What is multihoming was (design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation) Owen DeLong (Oct 24)
- Re: design of a real routing v. endpoint id seperation Owen DeLong (Oct 20)