Re: multi homing pressure

["Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>]

On Oct 19, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Todd Vierling wrote:

> > > > "Gartner said every location that requires mission-critical
> > > >  internet connectivity, including externally hosted
> > > >  websites, should be multi-homed"
> > >
> > > 200k routes, here we come!
> >
> > it is just good common sense though, eh?
>
> Well, not necessarily.
>
> Tier-2s should be given much more credit than they typically are in
> write-ups like this.  When a customer is single homed to a tier-2  
> that has
> multiple tier-1 upstreams, and uses a delegated netblock from the  
> tier-2's
> aggregations, that means one less ASN and one or more less routes  
> in the
> global table.
>
> It's a Good Thing(tm).

For you.

For the customer with an Internet "mission critical app", being tied  
to a Tier 2 has it's own set of problems, which might actually be  
worse than being tied to a Tier 1.

The Internet is a business tool.  If providers do not meet business  
requirements, providers will not be supported.  Period.

If 200K routes, or more ASNs, or small customers multihoming, or  
stuff like that scares you, find another line of work.  (Hint-hint to  
the v6 fanatics.)

--
TTFN,
patrick