nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi homing pressure
From: Todd Vierling <tv () duh org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:54:53 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
"Gartner said every location that requires mission-critical internet connectivity, including externally hosted websites, should be multi-homed"200k routes, here we come!it is just good common sense though, eh?
Well, not necessarily. Tier-2s should be given much more credit than they typically are in write-ups like this. When a customer is single homed to a tier-2 that has multiple tier-1 upstreams, and uses a delegated netblock from the tier-2's aggregations, that means one less ASN and one or more less routes in the global table. It's a Good Thing(tm). -- -- Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> <tv () pobox com> <todd () vierling name>
Current thread:
- Re: multi homing pressure, (continued)
- Re: multi homing pressure Jared Mauch (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Leo Bicknell (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Paul Vixie (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure David G. Andersen (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Paul Jakma (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure David G. Andersen (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Michael . Dillon (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure David Andersen (Oct 20)
- Re: multi homing pressure Jared Mauch (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Elmar K. Bins (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Edward Lewis (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Justin M. Streiner (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Edward B. Dreger (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure John Payne (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Mark Radabaugh (Oct 19)
- Re: multi homing pressure Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 19)
- RE: multi homing pressure Peter Kranz (Oct 19)