nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 news
From: Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:12:40 +0100 (IST)
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Andre Oppermann wrote:
don't. With your proposed you don't have much/any influence on the way your packets take.
Oh, NB: It's not my proposal at all. I'm merely exploring it. ;)Further, most of the thinking on this was done by the likes of Marcelo Bagnulo, Iljitsch van Beijnum and others. The fact that both of them are working on SHIM6 now probably is telling.
regards, -- Paul Jakma paul () clubi ie paul () jakma org Key ID: 64A2FF6A Fortune: Yeah. Maybe I do have the right ... What's that stuff? -- Homer Simpson Deep Space Homer
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 news, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Paul Jakma (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Andre Oppermann (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Todd Vierling (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Michael . Dillon (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news Tom Vest (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 news John Dupuy (Oct 18)