nanog mailing list archives

Re: And Now for Something Completely Different (was Re: IPv6 news)


From: Gordon Cook <cook () cookreport com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:16:55 -0400


Wasn't Noel Chiappa  Nimrods "father" ?

He explained his philosophy to me in an interview a decade ago as well as why he believed that BGP was not sustainable.

yet here we are  still chugging along

meanwhile back to your operational flows  ;-)

=============================================================
The COOK Report on Internet Protocol, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA 609 882-2572 (PSTN) 415 651-4147 (Lingo) cook () cookreport com Subscription
info: http://cookreport.com/subscriptions.shtml IMS and  an Internet
Economic  & Business Model  at: http://cookreport.com/14.09.shtml
=============================================================




On Oct 17, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Fred Baker wrote:

now, the proposal put forward lo these many moons ago to avoid any possibility of a routing change was, as I recall, Nimrod, and the Nimrod architecture called for variable length addresses in the network layer protocol and the use of a flow label (as in "IPv6 flow label") as a short-form address in some senses akin to a virtual circuit ID.


Current thread: