nanog mailing list archives
Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news)
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Paul Vixie wrote: > ...the necessary evil called CIDR. evil because it locked customers > into their providers, entrenched the existing large providers > against future providers, and made it hard or impossible for the > average endusing company to multihome. Uh, perhaps I'm being dense, but how does moving masking off byte boundaries have any of the above effects? -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news), (continued)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 15)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Crist Clark (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Daniel Roesen (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Meyer (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Crist Clark (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) william(at)elan.net (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) David Conrad (Oct 14)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Paul Vixie (Oct 15)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Bill Woodcock (Oct 17)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Tony Li (Oct 17)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Bill Woodcock (Oct 17)
- Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news) Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news John Payne (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 news Jared Mauch (Oct 14)
- Bad IPv6 connectivity or why not to announce more specifics (Was: IPv6 news) Jeroen Massar (Oct 13)
- Re: Bad IPv6 connectivity or why not to announce more specifics (Was: IPv6 news) Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 13)
- Re: Bad IPv6 connectivity or why not to announce more specifics (Was: IPv6 news) Jeroen Massar (Oct 13)