nanog mailing list archives
RE: Time for a real Internet highway (?)
From: "David Schwartz" <davids () webmaster com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:29:30 -0700
I wonder what the author would have said if major medical facilities would have had casualties because of the Level3/Cogentco debacle. Say a surgeon speaking via VoIP to another doctor about some brain surgery and the patient flatlines. What about a daytrader about to click on a nice sized trade... Oops.
I think that mission-critical Internet doesn't exist. I have no objection to creating it, but I do have an objection to replacing the best-effort Internet with a mission-critical one. There are legitimate reasons to want a best-effort service at the lowest possible cost. Because there isn't a mission-critical Internet yet, it is a serious mistake to put mission critical services such as the ones you speak of on the Internet. DS
Current thread:
- Time for a real Internet highway (?) Michael Painter (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Matt Ghali (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Michael Painter (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Oct 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) J. Oquendo (Oct 14)
- RE: Time for a real Internet highway (?) David Schwartz (Oct 14)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Scott Weeks (Oct 15)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: Time for a real Internet highway (?) Matt Ghali (Oct 14)