nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering)
From: John Kristoff <jtk () northwestern edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:25:54 -0500
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 11:54:34 +0100 Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:
While I realize that the "nuke survivable" thing is probably an old wives tale, it seems ridiculous that "the Internet" can't adjust by
[...]
It's not a myth. If the Internet were running RIP instead of BGP
For the Internet, I believe it was indeed a myth. I wasn't there, but according to someone who was: <http://www.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/2004-April/003940.html> John
Current thread:
- Fw: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Michael . Dillon (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Kristoff (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven Champeon (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Joel Jaeggli (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Steven Champeon (Oct 06)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) Michael . Dillon (Oct 07)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Levine (Oct 07)
- Re: Nuclear survivability (was: Cogent/Level 3 depeering) John Kristoff (Oct 06)