nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 26 Oct 2005 01:42:03 -0000
I don't understand what VeriSign receives in return for their kowtow (under the agreement, they basically waive any right to criticize ICANN's role).
As someone else noted, a perpetual cash cow in .COM with 7%/year escalator clause.
* ICANN signalled a positive outcome of a future Sitefinder review under the new process.
Nope, there's this complex process with outside experts to review any new proposed sitefinder like thing.
* ICANN promised to grant VeriSign the DNSSEC root and .ARPA maintenance without tender (the "Root Server Management Transition Agreement" goes into that direction; actually, the .ARPA stuff is the interesting one).
My reading is the opposite, ICANN will create the root zone now.
* VeriSign has recognized that they couldn't win in court, and suddenly want to play nice.
Quite possibly and don't be silly. More concretely, they probably decided they were unlikely to win more than this agreement gives them. R's, John
Current thread:
- ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Chris Woodfield (Oct 24)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Florian Weimer (Oct 24)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder william(at)elan.net (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Florian Weimer (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Todd Vierling (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder william(at)elan.net (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder John Levine (Oct 25)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Oct 27)
- Re: ICANN and Verisign settle over SiteFinder Florian Weimer (Oct 24)