Re: classful routes redux

[Fred Baker <fred () cisco com>]

actually, no, I could compare a /48 to a class A.

On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:51 PM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

> er..  would this be a poor characterization of the IPv6 addressing
> architecture which is encouraged by the IETF and the various RIR
> members?
>
>         class A ==  /32
>         class B ==  /48
>         class C ==  /56
>         hostroute == /64
>
> (and just think of all that spam than can originate from all those
>  "loose" IP addresses in that /64 for your local SMTP server!!! Yummy)
>
> -- Oat Willie

--------------------------------------------------------------
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already  
tomorrow in Australia." (Charles Schulz )