nanog mailing list archives
Re: oh k can you see
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:06:23 -0500
Sam Crooks wrote:
One of those pesky legal notice on all my outgoing email gets filtered by Randy's mail ... (the outgoing addition is not under my control).... maybe someone could tell him for me (as I can't email him...)>you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal >warning on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or >whether it may be archived, etc. >i do not accept such email. my mail user agent detected a legal >notice when i was opening your mail, and automatically deleted it. >so do not expect further response. >yes, i know your mail environment automatically added the legal >notice. well, my mail environment automatically detected it, >deleted it, and sent this message to you. so don't expect a lot >of sympathy. >randy
When/If nanog implements content filtering I vote randy's anti-legal spam gets included.
Current thread:
- Re: oh k can you see, (continued)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Bill Woodcock (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Daniel Karrenberg (Nov 07)
- Re: oh k can you see Sam Crooks (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Etaoin Shrdlu (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Abley (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Etaoin Shrdlu (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Bill Woodcock (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Sam Crooks (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Maimon (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Joe Maimon (Nov 01)
- Re: oh k can you see Sabri Berisha (Nov 02)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: oh k can you see Chris Woodfield (Nov 05)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 05)
- Re: oh k can you see Randy Bush (Nov 02)