nanog mailing list archives
Re: classful routes redux
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:41:23 +0000
... which is why I specifically said "no intention to ever connect to, or communicates with nodes on, the global network". In which case overlaps in adressblocks are irrelevant, as are any mention of NAT and firewalls as there is no connection (direct or indirect) between the networks.
The only case that I am aware of where there is truly *NO* intention to ever connect to the global Internet is military networks. When I was referring to other internets I did not have military networks in mind. In every other case that I am aware of, the partcipants in the internet also maintain connectivity to the Internet via alternate paths. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: classful routes redux, (continued)
- Re: classful routes redux Joseph S D Yao (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Michael . Dillon (Nov 07)
- Re: classful routes redux Joe Abley (Nov 07)
- Re: classful routes redux Stephen Sprunk (Nov 07)
- Message not available
- Re: classful routes redux Henk Uijterwaal (Nov 07)
- Re: classful routes redux Joseph S D Yao (Nov 07)
- Re: classful routes redux Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Per Heldal (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Per Heldal (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Michael . Dillon (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Stephen Sprunk (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Joseph S D Yao (Nov 09)
- Message not available
- IPv6 in a current defaultless SFP ISP John Dupuy (Nov 08)
- Re: classful routes redux Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Pekka Savola (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Geoff Huston (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Randy Bush (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 04)
- Re: classful routes redux Randy Bush (Nov 04)