nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP terminology question


From: Blaine Christian <blaine () blaines net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:57:57 -0500



On Nov 7, 2005, at 8:32 AM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:


At 9:44 AM -1000 11/6/05, Randy Bush wrote:
> A peer should never announce a route it has already announced unless
 that route is withdrawn.

one of many counterexamples: change in igp will cause change in
med.  any attribute changes, and announcement is required.

e.g., an internal igp oscillation could cause what the op
describes.

For the OP, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3345.txt

I give good odds this is not the oscillation issue. More likely a flapping IGP link and a lack of pull-up use (or pull-ups not installed such that link flaps would be non external impacting) etc...

I like pull-ups on all core devices personally...

Current thread: