nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equal access to content
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 02:39:38 -1000
That's a wonderful bluring of what Randy's issue was to the point of indistinction. Yes, try to flip it. The issue is when a consumer buys access to the "Internet" what do they get?
for some help, see rfc 4084, though it is weak in the area of interest. randy
Current thread:
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions, (continued)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Equal access to content Sean Donelan (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Blaine Christian (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Doug Barton (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Andy Davidson (Nov 03)
- Re: Equal access to content Christian Kuhtz (Nov 03)
- Equal access to content Sean Donelan (Nov 02)
- Re: Equal access to content Mike Leber (Nov 03)
- Re: Equal access to content Mike Leber (Nov 03)
- Re: Equal access to content Randy Bush (Nov 03)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Randy Bush (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Christian Kuhtz (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions David Barak (Nov 02)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Deepak Jain (Nov 02)
- RE: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Nov 03)
- Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions Christian Kuhtz (Nov 02)