nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic
From: Saku Ytti <saku+nanog () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 22:52:50 +0300
On (2005-05-25 11:16 -0700), Fred Baker wrote:
I guess the question is why, just because you don't want to offer a specific service, you want to prevent other ISPs from offering a stated service to a user? There are some fairly good-sized ISPs offering services based on the TOS octet. Are you trying to drive users to them? Any customer that is setting EF on VoIP service is certainly expecting that to go end to end.
The problem is opposite, because I want to offer differentiated services I want to rewrite the TOS byte. If I don't want to offer differentiated services myself I can leave it untouched. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic, (continued)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Eric A. Hall (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Lars Erik Gullerud (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Eric A. Hall (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Sean Donelan (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Eric A. Hall (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Lars Erik Gullerud (May 26)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Adi Linden (May 26)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Sean Donelan (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Saku Ytti (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Sean Donelan (May 25)