nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 11:49:23 -0400
On Wed, 25 May 2005 13:08:29 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson said:
My thoughts was otherwise to zero TOS information incoming on IXes, transits and incoming from customers, question is if customers expect this to be transparent or not.
Out of curiosity, what did you hope to accomplish by zeroing that field? (If you're planning to zero it on ingress to your network, use it for your own nefairious traffic-engineering purposes, and then re-zero on egress, *and* your contracts with your customers say it's OK to do it, then it might be defensible. Maybe. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Saku Ytti (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Saku Ytti (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Saku Ytti (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Eric A. Hall (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Sam Stickland (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Fred Baker (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Alan Hannan (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Eric A. Hall (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Sam Stickland (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Kevin Oberman (May 25)
- Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic Eric A. Hall (May 25)