nanog mailing list archives
Re: soBGP deployment
From: Tony Li <tony.li () tony li>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:14:09 -0700
Randy,
wrong. as deployment will be expensive and long, we will have one chance to deploy. so need a serious solution set for what we have to consider to be a very serious attack model. plan for attacks against the routing system as smart, well-researched, constant, ... as the best we see against ssh, htt, ... today.
Baloney. Deployment need not be expensive or long. And updates and enhancements need not be expensive or long either. Updates can be enabled on a per-BGP peer basis and thru careful use of capability bits can be nearly automatic. We need to decide what we are going to do, we need to code it, test it and field it. I seem to recall that in the good old days we did this in the space of a year. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: soBGP deployment, (continued)
- Re: soBGP deployment Alexei Roudnev (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment bmanning (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 23)
- the problems being solved -- or not Pekka Savola (May 24)
- Re: the problems being solved -- or not Russ White (May 24)
- Re: the problems being solved -- or not Pete Templin (May 24)
- Re: the problems being solved -- or not Pekka Savola (May 24)
- Re: the problems being solved -- or not Tony Li (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Randy Bush (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Daniel Karrenberg (May 25)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 25)
- Re: soBGP deployment Jeroen Massar (May 26)
- Re: soBGP deployment william(at)elan.net (May 26)
- Re: soBGP deployment Todd Underwood (May 26)
- Re: soBGP deployment Bill Woodcock (May 26)
- Re: soBGP deployment Bill Woodcock (May 26)
- Re: soBGP deployment Steve Gibbard (May 25)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 25)
- Re: soBGP deployment Steve Gibbard (May 25)