nanog mailing list archives
Re: soBGP deployment
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:44:58 +0200
* Steven M. Bellovin:
Fundamentally, the answer to this question is this: how accurate do you think the routing registries are?
I don't think it's important how accurate they are *now*, but how accurate they will be when some "secure" BGP version makes them (or, more precisely, the route registration process) the weakest link in the chain. The fact that careful checking on the ISP side protects other ISPs only (and your own business interests just in a very indirect fashion) makes me believe that securing BGP will be *very* hard.
Current thread:
- Re: [s,o]BGP deployment, (continued)
- Re: [s,o]BGP deployment bmanning (May 27)
- Re: [s,o]BGP deployment Randy Bush (May 27)
- Re: [s,o]BGP deployment Lucy E. Lynch (May 27)
- Re: [s,o]BGP deployment bmanning (May 27)
- Re: soBGP deployment Tony Li (May 28)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 24)
- Message not available
- Re: soBGP deployment Jay R. Ashworth (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Edward Lewis (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Russ White (May 23)
- Re: soBGP deployment Florian Weimer (May 24)
- Re: soBGP deployment Alexei Roudnev (May 24)