nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:34:34 -0400
Dean Anderson wrote:
And if they aren't found by open-relayblacklists, they aren't abused and there are no problems whatsoever.
How much credibility are you trying to lose?
Current thread:
- Re: SMTP AUTH, (continued)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Steve Sobol (May 02)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dean Anderson (May 03)
- Message not available
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dave Stewart (May 03)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Michael . Dillon (May 04)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Edward B. Dreger (May 01)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dean Anderson (May 01)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Matthew Sullivan (May 02)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dean Anderson (May 03)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Matthew Sullivan (May 03)
- Re: SMTP AUTH Dean Anderson (May 03)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Joe Maimon (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Dean Anderson (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? Matthew Sullivan (May 02)