nanog mailing list archives
Re: Malicious DNS request?
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 17 May 2005 14:00:24 +0000
joe_hznm () yahoo com sg (Joe Shen) writes:
I'm using BIND9.2.5 & BIND9.3.1 on two Solaris box, each box has two CPUs installed. it's found BIND8.4.6 running on one CPU could reach the throughput of BIND9.*.* running on two CPUs. Could we improve server throughput or lower lower the effect of those requests on NXDOMAIN?
yes. but "we" isn't nanog. can you take your bind-specific questions to a bind-related mailing list or newsgroup? www.isc.org has pointers. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Malicious DNS request? Joe Shen (May 12)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 12)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Gadi Evron (May 12)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Brad Knowles (May 12)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Brad Knowles (May 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Bill Stewart (May 15)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Brad Knowles (May 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Joe Shen (May 17)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Paul Vixie (May 17)
- Network Mitigation Devices Kevin Billings (May 17)
- Microsoft broke MTU discovery by last security pathces?? Alexei Roudnev (May 17)
- Re: Microsoft broke MTU discovery by last security pathces?? Mike Tancsa (May 17)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Paul Vixie (May 17)
- Re: Malicious DNS request? Brad Knowles (May 17)