nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again?
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 16 May 2005 16:31:58 +0000
... I repeat: One don't have to "support" EDNS0, just don't report it as error, like broken routers does with ECN. And in this "mode of operations" there's no MORE ways to abuse it for the said purpose than currently exists.
please actually read RFC 2671 before you ask any questions about it or make any comments on how it ought to have been writ differently. and when you're ready to ask such questions or make such comments, please make them on namedroppers () ops ietf org rather than on NANOG. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Verisign broke GTLDs again? Michael Tokarev (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Mark Andrews (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Michael Tokarev (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Florian Weimer (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Michael Tokarev (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Florian Weimer (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Paul Vixie (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Michael Tokarev (May 16)
- Re: Verisign broke GTLDs again? Mark Andrews (May 16)