nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google DNS problems?!?
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 19:22:27 +0300
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
And actually it's quite common to have only one MX record today if the secondaries have no clue of the valid recipients.On 5/8/05, aljuhani <info () riyadmail com> wrote:Well I am not a DNS expert but why Google have the primary gmail MX record without load balancing and all secondaries are sharing the same priority level.Has it occured to you that there are other ways of load balancing mailserver clusters than just setting MX records?
(to avoid queueing bounces) Pete
Current thread:
- Google DNS problems?!? Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (May 07)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Matthew S. Hallacy (May 07)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Hank Nussbacher (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? aljuhani (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Petri Helenius (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Andy Davidson (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? aljuhani (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? aljuhani (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Robert L Mathews (May 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (May 07)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Matthew S. Hallacy (May 07)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Randy Bush (May 08)
- Re: Google DNS problems?!? Matthew S. Hallacy (May 07)