nanog mailing list archives
Re: google.com outage?
From: "Jonathan M. Slivko" <jonathan () slivko org>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 21:29:11 -0400
Daniel,Hmmm..... I don't think so, but the IP's seem to be different than they were before from a cached WHOIS. IIRC, didn't Google used to be on InterNAP and now they're on Cogent/Verio?
-- Jonathan Daniel Medina wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:48:03PM +0000, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:Om Malik seems to think they were hacked: http://www.gigaom.com/2005/05/07/google-hacked/ Decide for yourselves.Folks reporting the hijack were most likely infected with adware and being redirected. Oops, I didn't mean "infected with adware". I mean they installed a "customized search tool bar", or "web query optimizer" for themselves. Wasn't Google using Akamai? Is the "L" in "l.google.com" for load-balancing? From the above link: "Recap: 6:13PM PST: Google was not hacked, but instead had a DNS problem. For some the site was redirecting to the SoGoSearch page. All services have been restored."
Current thread:
- google.com outage? Jonathan M. Slivko (May 07)
- Re: google.com outage? Jonathan M. Slivko (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: google.com outage? Jonathan M. Slivko (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: google.com outage? Jonathan M. Slivko (May 07)
- Re: google.com outage? Michael Loftis (May 07)
- Re: google.com outage? Richard Welty (May 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: google.com outage? Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: google.com outage? Jonathan M. Slivko (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: google.com outage? Paul Vixie (May 08)
- Re: google.com outage? Simon Waters (May 09)