nanog mailing list archives

Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIP


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 13:04:25 -0400


On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:51:33AM -0700, Bill Woodcock wrote:
That said, a widely-implemented well-known anycast address that would
give you location information is a really cool idea. A smoother
imlementation might be to just have a well-known address that you'd
do a DNS LOC query against, since describing locations better than
postal-codes do is a problem the DNS folks have already solved.

Which address would resolve differently, depending on which DNS server
you're talking to?

I'm not sure that's good enough; being able to identify the *network
ingress point* is the thing I'm after.  For wired connections, that's
the access concentrator, for wireless ones, the nearest tower. 

It would be necessary to be able to tailor the response to the inquiry
based on that, I think, to fulfill the requirement *I'm* trying to
fulfill in this posited design -- which is not guaranteed to be the
same as any possible regulatory requirement.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Designer                          Baylink                             RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates        The Things I Think                        '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://baylink.pitas.com             +1 727 647 1274

      If you can read this... thank a system administrator.  Or two.  --me


Current thread: