nanog mailing list archives
Re: outage/maintenance window opinion
From: Eric Gauthier <eric () roxanne org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:59:01 -0500
Heya, I disagree as this entire event wasn't a planned outage. The "planned" part was what you intended to do and, if its anything like the maintenance reports that I send and receive, you typically state how long you expect the impact will be and that it will take place within your maintenance window. I'd argue that you should start the clock ticking when the outage first happened and then take off from that whatever you annouced as the impact duration. For example, if you said that the impact would be a ten-minute outage sometime during your window from 2am to 5am and your outage started at 2am, I'd count this as an unplanned outage starting from 2:10am. That's just my $0.02... On another note, you had a 3 hour window and a 6 hour outage. It sounds like someone didn't seriously consider the "back out" part of your change management planning. You really should have that as part of your process and have a hard deadline within the window after which you revert the network to its previous state. Eric :)
Current thread:
- outage/maintenance window opinion Luke Parrish (Mar 28)
- Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Vicky Rode (Mar 28)
- RE: outage/maintenance window opinion Matthew Kaufman (Mar 28)
- RE: outage/maintenance window opinion Bill Nash (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Eric Gauthier (Mar 28)
- Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Luke Parrish (Mar 30)
- Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Jay R. Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Pete Templin (Mar 28)
- Re: outage/maintenance window opinion Luke Parrish (Mar 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: outage/maintenance window opinion Howard, W. Lee (Mar 30)