nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL scomp
From: Jim Segrave <jes () nl demon net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:48:11 +0100
On Tue 01 Mar 2005 (22:36 -0500), Joe Maimon wrote:
Barry Shein wrote:On March 1, 2005 at 14:17 jes () nl demon net (Jim Segrave) wrote:I don't understand this complaint - we process AOL TOS Notifications daily and I find perhaps 1 in a hundred or so are not valid complaints.Here about 99% are not valid or interesting. Which is to say, I had one small burst once caused by an infected customer machine which we got shut off fast and fixed. The rest are virtually all just people on mailing lists hosted here sending each and every completely on-topic posting to TOS. I suppose I should figure out some way to track them so I can boot them off those lists since AOL removes all identifying information.Apparently the ratio of valid/invalid AOL notifications is a usefull indicator on the cleanliness of the relevant network.
Or alternatively, some networks have few users who communicate with AOL customers - they aren't currently big-time in the Netherlands - and the ratio of valid to invalid complaints has sweet FA to do with anything else. We don't set up mail forwarding for residential customers so that's another non-issue. -- Jim Segrave jes () nl demon net
Current thread:
- Re: AOL scomp Jim Segrave (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Vinny Abello (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Todd Vierling (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Vinny Abello (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Chris Adams (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Barry Shein (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Joe Maimon (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Jim Segrave (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Gary E. Miller (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp David Lesher (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Joe Maimon (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AOL scomp John Levine (Mar 01)
- Re: AOL scomp Gregory Hicks (Mar 02)
- Re: AOL scomp Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Mar 02)