nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking port 53
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 28 Mar 2005 03:08:42 -0000
25, 80, 110, 443, ... are blocked. so no ssh or other vpns. i.e. YOU FORCE WIRELESS USERS TO BE INSECURE. so, if i was so inclined, i could sit there and tap everyone's email etc.
I thought everyone ran an ssh server on port 443 by now. It's the easiest way to get through these overbearing firewalls. -- Regards, John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 330 5711 johnl () iecc com, Mayor, http://johnlevine.com, Member, Provisional board, Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail
Current thread:
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real?, (continued)
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Florian Weimer (Mar 30)
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Joe Maimon (Mar 30)
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? bmanning (Mar 27)
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Joe Maimon (Mar 27)
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Florian Weimer (Mar 27)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Florian Weimer (Mar 27)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Florian Weimer (Mar 29)
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Randy Bush (Mar 27)
- Blocking port 53 Sean Donelan (Mar 27)
- Re: Blocking port 53 Randy Bush (Mar 27)
- Re: Blocking port 53 John Levine (Mar 27)
- how about the basics? [was: Re: Blocking port 53] Gadi Evron (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 27)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS cache poisoning attacks -- are they real? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Mar 28)