nanog mailing list archives

Re: Please verify RFC1918 filters


From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 11:44:11 -0500




vijay gill wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:13:07PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:

y'all might give us something pingable in that space so we can
do a primitive and incomplete test in a simple fashion.

randy



try 172.128.1.1


/vijay


Wouldnt 172.15.255.254 and 172.32.0.1 do better at helping to nail down improper filter issues?

Wont above miss detecting of

172.0.0.0 0.15-127.255.255
172.16.0.0 0.31-63.255.255

while it will catch only

172.0.0.0 0.255.255.255

(disregarding other possible permutations)
?

Also perhaps a traceroute http web site there would be nice also.

Perhaps that is all more trouble than its worth.....




Current thread: