nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?
From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:15:37 -0500
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 15:55 -0500, David Lesher wrote:
In either case, why will the clued ISP's want to block 587?
It's not the clueful ISPs that you need worry about. -Jim P.
Current thread:
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?, (continued)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Frank Louwers (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Nils Ketelsen (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Michael G (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Jason Frisvold (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? David Lesher (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Chris Horry (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Stephen Fulton (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? David Lesher (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? Jim Popovitch (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? J.D. Falk (Mar 01)
- Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587? JC Dill (Mar 01)