nanog mailing list archives

Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill


From: Rachael Treu <rara () navigo com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:35:24 -0600


On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:33:44AM -0800, Bill Woodcock said something to the effect of:

    > > It's also voluntary on the part of the service provider.
    >    What !?!  Surely you Jest!

Uh, yes, I was joking.  Unfortunately, I do believe, on credible evidence, 
that there are people stupid enough to be trying to legislate the 
operation of the Internet without having first understood how it's done 
right now.  Case in point.

                                -Bill

What do you mean?!  I'm writing an email right now to my 
service provider, demanding that I get *only* porn.  I 
want all pr0n, all the time.  No need to wast bandwidth
on this smtp garbage, or any other http-type hooey, for
that matter.

I want my OPoIP (only porn over IP)!  I want it secured,
even!  Encrypted porn with an SLA I can wave SLA about if 
anything else slips through like pesky news or children's
pages or something icky.

Are you telling me my provider reserves the right to 
refuse me this service?  <sniff>

--ra  ;)

-- 
k. rachael treu, CISSP                          rara () navigo com
              ..quis custodiet ipsos custodes?..
(this email has been brought to you by the letters 'v' and 'i'.)


Current thread: