nanog mailing list archives
Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP
From: Adam Rothschild <asr+nanog () latency net>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:29:50 -0500
On 2005-03-05-18:43:38, Nathan Allen Stratton <nathan () robotics net> wrote: [...]
In fact because of the lame way current providers are doing 911 (hading calls to PSAP administration lines) BroadVoice does not offer 911 at all yet. I would rather NOT offer it and tell users to have a way to call 911 via CELL or PSTN then to have them count on me getting them to a PSAP with the current options.
I'd like extend a public "thank you" for that. It's a real shame more residential providers don't follow suit, given the brokenness (and false sense of security) of their existing implementations. -a
Current thread:
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP, (continued)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Eric A. Hall (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Michael . Dillon (Mar 07)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Bill Nash (Mar 04)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Robert Blayzor (Mar 04)
- RE: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Vivien M. (Mar 05)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Bill Nash (Mar 06)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Adi Linden (Mar 07)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Bill Nash (Mar 07)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Rachael Treu (Mar 07)
- Message not available
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Nathan Allen Stratton (Mar 05)
- Re: US slaps fine on company blocking VoIP Adam Rothschild (Mar 05)