Re: Utah considers law to mandate ISP's block "harmful" sites

[Roy Engehausen <garlic () garlic com>]

You missed a very important line in the article:

"Internet providers in Utah must offer their customers a way to disable 
access to sites on the list or face felony charges."

In other words you must provide a mechanism for a customer to "opt-in" 
to a filter.  Doesn't sound illegal to force an ISP to provide a feature.

Roy

Christopher L. Morrow wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
>  
>
> > "The Utah governor is deciding whether to sign a
> > bill that would require Internet providers to block
> > Web sites deemed pornographic and that could also
> > target e-mail providers and search engines."
> >
> > http://news.com.com/Utah+governor+weighs+antiporn+proposal/2100-1028_3-5598912.html?tag=nefd.top
> >    
>
> Someone might consider pointing them to the law from the state of PA that
> did similar things... Then point them at the overturning of that law.
>