nanog mailing list archives
Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
From: Andre Oppermann <nanog-list () nrg4u com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:26:49 +0200
Scott Morris wrote:
We could have been much better served adding 3-bits at the beginning. Effectively giving a full IP v4 space to every continent (even Antartica) and having an extra one for the extra-terrestrial working group. ;) And it would have given us real geographic-based filtering capabilities at the same time without any major changes to everything we have worked so hard to get to the level of insanity where we are today. *shrug* Simple things often get overlooked.
bzzzt... You just described a rule #1 violation; IP addresses are routable entities and thus by definition unsuitable for any kind of geo-location. Rule #2 would be that IP addresses do (and must) not encode routing information, they just serve to transport data. All routing information is carried on the routing layer and applied to the forwarding layer from there. When do people learn that these layers do not intermix just like water and oil do not? I guess the only lession history teaches us is that it doesn't. -- Andre
Current thread:
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008, (continued)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Larry Smith (Jun 30)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jun 30)
- RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Kuhtz, Christian (Jun 30)
- RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Kuhtz, Christian (Jun 30)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Stephen Sprunk (Jun 30)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jun 30)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 30)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jun 30)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Christopher L. Morrow (Jun 30)
- RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott Morris (Jun 30)
- Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Andre Oppermann (Jun 30)
- RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Scott Morris (Jun 30)
- RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jun 30)
- RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008 Randy Bush (Jun 30)