nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP phishing
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:58:16 +0100
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Brad Knowles wrote:
SPF is not a panacea. In fact, it is pretty much totally worthless, unless you are the sole owner of a given domain and you can guarantee that all mail you ever send will always be routed through the machines that you own and control, and you know that you don't ever forward e-mail for any of your other accounts.
Actually, what you have to guarantee is that you never send email to anyone who forwards their email elsewhere. This is impossible. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: ISP phishing, (continued)
- Re: ISP phishing Joel Jaeggli (Jun 23)
- Re: ISP phishing Gadi Evron (Jun 23)
- Re: ISP phishing Joel Jaeggli (Jun 23)
- Re: ISP phishing Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 23)
- Re: ISP phishing Robert Boyle (Jun 24)
- Re: ISP phishing Mark Tombaugh (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Paul Wouters (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Robert Boyle (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 28)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Mike Leber (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Peter Corlett (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Brad Knowles (Jun 30)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing Tony Finch (Jun 29)
- Re: ISP phishing william(at)elan.net (Jun 29)