nanog mailing list archives

RE: md5 for bgp tcp sessions

From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:22:07 -0400

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Todd Underwood
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 5:57 AM
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions



ras, all,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:14:12AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:04:09PM -0400, Todd Underwood wrote:


rolling out magic code because your
vendor tells you to is a bad idea;


That's mostly the result of the calamitous failure in vulnerability 
release methodology, not Operator stupidity. 

-M<

Current thread:

md5 for bgp tcp sessions Todd Underwood (Jun 22)
- Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 22)
  - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 22)
  - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Todd Underwood (Jun 23)
    - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Jared Mauch (Jun 23)
    - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 23)
- Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Eric Gauthier (Jun 23)
  - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Joe Abley (Jun 23)
  - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Robert E . Seastrom (Jun 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Barry Greene (bgreene) (Jun 23)
- RE: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Hannigan, Martin (Jun 23)
  - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Todd Underwood (Jun 23)
    - Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions Jared Mauch (Jun 23)