Re: MCI routing loop near Chicago

[James Couzens <jcouzens () 6o4 ca>]

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 04:52 -0700, James Couzens wrote:
> MCI routing loop near Chicago

As Alexander Koch pointed out I could have been more detailed in my post
with respect to methods attempted to notify the relevant parties prior
to posting to the NANOG list.

With that in mind, after roughly two hours of attempting to notify MCI
through the available channels receiving only two responses, both from
MCI (US Robotics can not respond, their poor DNS setup has left me with
no means to contact them via e-mail (NS2.RACKSPACE.COM doesn't appear to
know about USR and their primary is unreachable to me and additionally
through several on-line DNS lookup engines I tried)) I felt that I would
post to NANOG as a last resort.

For what its worth the auto-generated ticket number I received from
MCI's "help4u () mci com" address was:  2005062102342.  The other response
I received was an "Out of Office Autoreply" from hostmaster () mci com.

Hope that helps,

Cheers,

James

-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer

http://libspf.org       - ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://ses.codeshare.ca - Signed Envelope Sender, A comprehensive
and simple solution to stopping SMTP forgery.   Please review our
work and find any flaws in our protocol.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF

"This is not quite as crazy as it sounds, since people knew how
 to write small, efficient programs in those days, a skill that
 has subsequently been lost." -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part