Re: More long AS-sets announced

[MarcoH <marcoh () marcoh net>]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > Btw, if you postponed the 'experiment', how come I did pick up this one:
> >
> > 84.205.73.0/24 12654 12654 
> > {1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
> > 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
> > 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
> > 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
> > 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
> > 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
> > 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,
> > 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221}
>
> That path was announced during the window of notice we had given for the 
> announcements. However, you will notice that that was not the complete 
> set of announcements we intended to make, which included 25-, 50-, 75-. 
> and 100-element AS-sets.

By the way, accoording to your annoucement:

| The prefixes involved will be 84.205.73.0/24 and 84.205.89.0/24, both
| orignating in AS12654. The AS-sets will consist of AS12654 repeated n
| times, thus the paths will look like 12654 {12654, 12654, ..., 12654}.
| No other AS numbers will be used. The values of n we will use are 25,
| 50, 75 and 100.

What's the '1221' doing there ?

Grtx,

MarcoH