nanog mailing list archives
Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo () ripe net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:24:00 +0200
Jeroen Massar wrote:
And it also makes clear why it didn't pop up in GRH, as when you insert the GRH ASN 8298 it won't be announced to GRH and thus it doesn't get detected and as quite a number of people check only there it can go quite unnoticed in the IPv6 tables...*
Actually, we never inserted AS8298 in any of the AS-sets we announced, so you should have seen them...
Sidetracking: BGP should never accept a path from another peer containing the ASN of a directly connected peer... does it or not?
Hmm, I don't know. It wouldn't likely be selected as best path, of course, but why shouldn't it be accepted?
Regards, Lorenzo -- lorenzo () ripe net colitti () dia uniroma3 it www.ripe.net www.dia.uniroma3.it/~compunet RIPE NCC Roma Tre Computer Networks research group
Current thread:
- Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Lorenzo Colitti (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Randy Bush (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Lorenzo Colitti (Jun 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Lorenzo Colitti (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Florian Weimer (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Jeroen Massar (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Lorenzo Colitti (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Joe Abley (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Florian Weimer (Jun 09)
- Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets Randy Bush (Jun 09)