nanog mailing list archives
Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:28:38 +0300
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Filtering anything else than port 80 and maybe 53 would allow them to experience the Internet in safe and controlled manner!Not allowing your users to run eggdrop or other irc bots on the shells you give them, and generally not hosting irc stuff would definitely help there.
Pete
Current thread:
- Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Florian Weimer (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 29)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services James Feger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services John Neiberger (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services chip (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)
- Re: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services Christopher L. Morrow (Jul 28)