nanog mailing list archives
Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:27:18 +0530
On 11/07/05, Todd Vierling <tv () duh org> wrote:
And this is the problem -- but then, such miserably inept admins are usually also responsible for the *outflow*, and are thus working for a highly intersecting set of ISPs that should be targeted for escalation, "collateral damage", "false positive" blocking in order to get them to wake up and read documentation for once....
I'd not be too quick to blame them considering that they are after all supposed to be on the same side we are. And because occam's razor is always in mind. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID Rich Kulawiec (Jul 06)
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID Jason Frisvold (Jul 06)
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID trainier (Jul 06)
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID Todd Vierling (Jul 09)
- boycotting peers (was Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID) J.D. Falk (Jul 09)
- Re: boycotting peers (was Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID) Todd Vierling (Jul 09)
- Re: boycotting peers (was Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID) william(at)elan.net (Jul 09)
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 09)
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID Todd Vierling (Jul 11)
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 11)
- Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming: Microsoft pushing Sender ID Todd Vierling (Jul 09)