Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008

[Andre Oppermann <nanog-list () nrg4u com>]

Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:08:08AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > On the other hand a large DFZ routing table would simply dampen its
> > growth by itself.  If it gets to costly to multihome because of the
> > hardware requirements only few would be able to so.  Ergo we have a
> > negative feedback system here keeping itself in check.  Case solved
> > and closed.
>
> Multihomed end sites usually get away with receiving only default route
> or some partial routes from their upstreams. So technically you can
> BGP multihome with Cisco 1600 or even smaller easily (dunno where BGP
> support is starting to become available).

Technically yes, practically no.  At least not for the purposes people
normally want to multihome.

--
Andre