nanog mailing list archives

Re: mh (RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008)


From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 19:26:28 GMT



Dave,

I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
misunderstood your point...

$.02,

- ferg


-- Dave Crocker <dhc2 () dcrocker net> wrote:

[re: shim6]

the effort is relying on IPv6 and on the disappearance of NATs, for v6.  one 
might consider these to be critical dependencies that are rather risky.


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: