nanog mailing list archives

RE: NETGEAR in the core...


From: "Sam Crooks" <sam.a.crooks () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 05:07:41 -0700


SCO Unix runs on cyberguards older than 6.0 (aka Classic)
Linux 2.6 kernel runs on the 6.0 (aka TSP)   as for SG line... I don't
know...

At home I run WRT54g w/ a opensource firewall image loaded into it... it is
a little buggier than I'd risk my job on...I find CG's to be an enormous
PITA, better that Sonicwalls, but not a good as a Netscreen or PIX

YMMV

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Henry Yen
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 8:33 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: NETGEAR in the core...


On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:11:28AM -0400, Robert Boyle wrote:
I'm interested in people's experiences with consumer-grade routers
functioning in non-NAT mode; that is to say, running PPPoE to the ISP
and routing a /29 or a /28.  A sane filtering language and stateful
firewall that can operate in non-NAT mode is a plus.

http://www.cyberguard.com/products/firewall/SG_Family/

I think linux runs inside those.  Vendor-supplied, yes, but if the OP
wants to avoid linux altogether...

No personal experience, but could a LinkSys/WRT45g with
custom linux load be even cheaper?

Can a cisco 1600 run PPPoE?

-- 
Henry Yen                                       Aegis Information Systems,
Inc.
Senior Systems Programmer                       Hicksville, New York


Current thread: