nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change?
From: Bill Nash <billn () billn net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:56:44 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Janet Sullivan wrote:
Bill Nash wrote:On/off topic is very relevant, since it determines moderator involvement. Many people feel moderation is broken, and topical candidates are an element of it. Seeing post after post from people who feel they've been unfairly sanctioned, or having clueful users appearing on virtual milk cartons is a problem. Fix it.https://lists.bgp4.net/mailman/listinfo/netops
This is an excellent point to bring up, and it's good to have alternative forums.
But.It's a band-aid, in the short term, and won't do much to 'unalienate' (disalienate?) those who have departed, by choice or otherwise, because of moderator actions.
- billn
Current thread:
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Hannigan, Martin (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Janet Sullivan (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Jim Popovitch (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Paul Vixie (Jan 05)
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Janet Sullivan (Jan 05)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Bill Nash (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Joe Johnson (Jan 04)
- RE: Proposed list charter/AUP change? Scott Weeks (Jan 04)