nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 12:16:02 +0100
On 1-jan-05, at 2:22, J. Oquendo wrote:
Supposedly the vulns associated with IPv6 are: reconnaissance, unauth'd access, layers 3-4 spoofing, ARP and DHCP attacks, smurfs, routing attacks, viruses andworms, translations, transistions, and tunneling mechanisms. According to Sean Covery's IPv6 Security Threats (http://www.seanconvery.com/SEC-2003.pdf)
No, that list is just a starting point for the discussion. A lot of stuff in the list doesn't amount to anything. (For instance, there is no ARP in IPv6.)
I don't understand your example, BTW.But as long as people get to snif your packets, you're dead in the water unless you use IPsec.
Current thread:
- IPv6, IPSEC and DoS J. Oquendo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Rob Thomas (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Rob Thomas (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS J. Oquendo (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS David Barak (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Joe Abley (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS David Barak (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 03)